Ex-judges push to look into "anti-weaponization fund" deal
Sentiment Mix
Geography
Expert Signals
Politics - Google News US Headlines
source • 1 mention
CBS News - Top Stories
source • 1 mention
AI-Generated Claims
Generated from linked receipts; click sources for full context.
A group of 35 former federal judges asked a court to reopen a legal dispute between President Trump and the government, calling the deal to create a $1.776 billion "anti-weaponization fund" potentially fraudulent.
Supported by 1 story
Related Events
Trump's IRS case should be reopened so court can probe possible 'fraud,' ex-judges argue - CNBC
Uncategorized • 5/28/2026
Fair housing groups file lawsuit arguing a federal rule change removes protections - Yahoo
Uncategorized • 5/28/2026
Google engineer charged with using inside information to win $1.2M on Polymarket - The Washington Post
Uncategorized • 5/28/2026
Prosecutors say ex-CIA official stole $40 million in gold bars from agency - The Washington Post
Industry • 5/28/2026
CNBC Daily Open: Oil falls on Iran peace hopes — then U.S. launches airstrikes - CNBC
Product Launch • 5/28/2026